AMLBot Academy

According to AMLBot's Crypto Crime Report 2025–2026, based on the analysis of 2,500+ real post-incident investigations, 65% of crypto crime cases were driven by Social Engineering rather than Technical Exploits. Investment Scams accounted for 25% of all cases by volume, followed by Phishing (18%) and Device

Crypto Businesses process high volumes of transactions every day, but the real compliance challenge is not volume alone — it is the fact that risk travels through transaction chains, counterparties, and indirect exposure that is rarely obvious at first glance. A wallet may appear clean in isolation while still carrying meaningful

INTRO Global Crypto Tax reporting requirements are now taking shape across dozens of countries, each reflecting a combination of domestic regulatory priorities and international standard-setting. Since 2021, major jurisdictions have been translating the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework into domestic law while simultaneously developing their own parallel obligations. Understanding

Intro Not all stolen cryptocurrency can be recovered. Blockchain immutability, non-custodial wallet architecture, mixing services, cross-chain dispersion, and jurisdictional enforcement gaps each create independent barriers that can make recovery technically and legally unfeasible. Understanding these limitations matters before committing resources to a recovery effort. Quick Facts * Blockchain transactions are permanent

INTRO Crypto Tax Reporting is now a mandatory compliance obligation in 67 jurisdictions worldwide. The OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the EU’s DAC8 Directive require crypto platforms to collect and submit transaction data to tax authorities annually. Understanding what these obligations cover and who they apply to

INTRO Governments are increasing oversight of crypto markets — not by banning activity, but by making it visible. The core issue is simple: crypto transactions can be executed globally, often outside traditional financial systems. As a result, tax authorities historically had limited visibility into cross-border crypto activity. The Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework

INTRO The EU DAC8 Directive requires Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) operating in the European Union to collect customer identification and transaction data and report it to national tax authorities starting from 1 January 2026. While the directive is officially in force, approximately 12–13 Member States faced formal infringement procedures

Crypto scam losses reached an estimated $12 billion in 2024, and in 2025 that number climbed past $14 billion on-chain. The trend heading into 2026 is clear: crypto fraud is growing faster than the crypto market itself. While scammers often tailor their approach to older adults and people with limited

The modern crypto ecosystem spans hundreds of blockchains operating in parallel. Fund flows rarely remain within a single network: assets move between chains through bridges, decentralized exchanges, and wrapped token systems. Each transfer across a network boundary breaks transaction continuity. A movement that starts as ETH on Ethereum may appear

Travel Rule violations are the most commonly cited infraction under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) — the primary US Anti-Money Laundering Law — identified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during examinations of Money Services Businesses (MSBs) engaged in convertible virtual currency transmission. (Source: Kenneth A. Blanco, FinCEN Director, Blockchain Symposium, March

INTRO A blockchain ledger records every transaction, but it never tells you who is behind an address. It shows that 0x7a3f… sent 14.2 ETH to 0xb8c1…, yet reveals nothing about whether those strings belong to an individual, an exchange, or a sanctioned mixer. Multiply this by the billion-plus addresses

When you look up a wallet on a block explorer, you can see individual transactions — amounts, addresses, timestamps. But that's not the same as understanding where money actually came from or where it ended up. Transaction tracing goes further. It reconstructs the full movement of funds across multiple

The Crypto Travel Rule is no longer a distant regulatory concept. In an increasing number of jurisdictions, it is an enforceable obligation, and virtual asset service providers are expected to demonstrate compliance in practice, not merely in policy documents. Yet the gap between regulatory intent and day-to-day operations remains wide,

Intro The financial regulatory landscape of the European Union has undergone a transformation with the introduction of the new Anti-Money Laundering (AML) package, specifically targeting the sector of digital assets. Central to this transformation is the implementation of the EU Crypto Travel Rule, codified under Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, also

Summary AMLR is now in force and is reshaping how crypto businesses in Europe approach KYC obligations. This article explains why AMLR does not “add KYC from scratch,” but reorganizes existing EU AML requirements into a single, stricter EU regulation — shifting KYC compliance from a one-time onboarding check to a

The crypto industry in the United Kingdom enters 2025 under a developing regulatory regime shaped by post-Brexit autonomy. After leaving the EU, the UK has been crafting its own cryptoasset rules: the landmark Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2023 officially brought cryptoassets into the UK’s regulated perimeter, the

Intro Know Your Customer (KYC) service providers have become an important part of the infrastructure for crypto and fintech companies. KYC helps businesses to check that customers are who they say they are. Their significance has grown further in 2024-2025, as the industry faces rising fraud and complex Anti-Money Laundering

TL;DR: The EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation introduces a unified MiCA license for Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs). Any crypto business offering crypto-asset services in the EU will need this authorization to legally operate across all 27 Member States under a single regulatory framework. Key Requirements: Obtaining a

TL;DR: US crypto regulations in 2025 are complex and fragmented, lacking a unified federal framework. Crypto businesses must navigate requirements set by multiple key agencies: the SEC, CFTC , FinCEN (AML/KYC), and the IRS. Key Compliance Requirements: — Businesses must implement Anti-Money Laundering (AML) programs, including independent audits, risk assessment

The global regulatory net has tightened significantly. According to FATF’s Latest Targeted Update, only 99 jurisdictions have passed or are implementing the FATF's Travel Rule, which mandates the sharing of originator and beneficiary data for virtual asset transfers. However, a critical gap remains: 75% of assessed jurisdictions

💡As of 2025, over 75% of jurisdictions remain only partially compliant with FATF’s AML standards for virtual assets, according to FATF’s June 2025 evaluation. The EU leads regulatory harmonization with MiCA and AMLR, while the U.S. applies multi-agency oversight through FinCEN, SEC, and OFAC. These shifts mark

Few things are more stressful than discovering your digital funds are gone. A scam or theft in cryptocurrency can trigger panic, leaving every victim with one burning question: how to recover stolen cryptocurrency? According to AMLBot’s data, monthly losses across different fraud categories show a clear trend: while centralized

AML and KYC failures in the crypto industry no longer result in warnings or minor corrective actions. Today, non-compliance leads to regulatory investigations, financial penalties, license restrictions, and long-term reputational damage. This article does not explain how to complete KYC or what specific platforms require. Instead, it examines the real