AMLBot Academy

According to AMLBot's Crypto Crime Report 2025–2026, 65% of crypto incidents investigated across 2,500+ real cases were driven by social engineering — not technical exploits. Investment Scams, Phishing, and Device Compromise accounted for the majority of case volume. The victims were not exclusively large exchanges or institutional

Independent research conducted across 2024–2025 found that more than 50% of wallets ultimately flagged as high-risk were initially assessed as safe at the time of onboarding. A wallet that passes every identity check on day one can become a conduit for laundered funds on day thirty — and if

Intro According to Crypto Crime Report 2025–2026, 65% of crypto crime cases were driven by Social Engineering rather than Technical Exploits. Investment Scams accounted for 25% of all cases by volume, followed by Phishing (18%) and Device Compromise (13%). The data confirms that modern crypto crime has entered a

Crypto Businesses process high volumes of transactions every day, but the real compliance challenge is not volume alone — it is the fact that risk travels through transaction chains, counterparties, and indirect exposure that is rarely obvious at first glance. A wallet may appear clean in isolation while still carrying meaningful

INTRO Global Crypto Tax reporting requirements are now taking shape across dozens of countries, each reflecting a combination of domestic regulatory priorities and international standard-setting. Since 2021, major jurisdictions have been translating the OECD's Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework into domestic law while simultaneously developing their own parallel

Intro Not all stolen cryptocurrency can be recovered. Blockchain immutability, non-custodial wallet architecture, mixing services, cross-chain dispersion, and jurisdictional enforcement gaps each create independent barriers that can make recovery technically and legally unfeasible. Understanding these limitations matters before committing resources to a recovery effort. Quick Facts * Blockchain transactions

INTRO Crypto Tax Reporting is now a mandatory compliance obligation in 67 jurisdictions worldwide. The OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) and the EU’s DAC8 Directive require crypto platforms to collect and submit transaction data to tax authorities annually. Understanding what these obligations cover and who they apply

INTRO Governments are increasing oversight of crypto markets — not by banning activity, but by making it visible. The core issue is simple: crypto transactions can be executed globally, often outside traditional financial systems. As a result, tax authorities historically had limited visibility into cross-border crypto activity. The Crypto-Asset

INTRO The EU DAC8 Directive requires Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs) operating in the European Union to collect customer identification and transaction data and report it to national tax authorities starting from 1 January 2026. While the directive is officially in force, approximately 12–13 Member States faced formal infringement

Crypto scam losses reached an estimated $12 billion in 2024, and in 2025 that number climbed past $14 billion on-chain. The trend heading into 2026 is clear: crypto fraud is growing faster than the crypto market itself. While scammers often tailor their approach to older adults and people with

The modern crypto ecosystem spans hundreds of blockchains operating in parallel. Fund flows rarely remain within a single network: assets move between chains through bridges, decentralized exchanges, and wrapped token systems. Each transfer across a network boundary breaks transaction continuity. A movement that starts as ETH on Ethereum may appear

Travel Rule violations are the most commonly cited infraction under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) — the primary US Anti-Money Laundering Law — identified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) during examinations of Money Services Businesses (MSBs) engaged in convertible virtual currency transmission. (Source: Kenneth A. Blanco, FinCEN Director, Blockchain Symposium,

INTRO A blockchain ledger records every transaction, but it never tells you who is behind an address. It shows that 0x7a3f… sent 14.2 ETH to 0xb8c1…, yet reveals nothing about whether those strings belong to an individual, an exchange, or a sanctioned mixer. Multiply this by the billion-plus

When you look up a wallet on a block explorer, you can see individual transactions — amounts, addresses, timestamps. But that's not the same as understanding where money actually came from or where it ended up. Transaction tracing goes further. It reconstructs the full movement of funds across multiple

The Crypto Travel Rule is no longer a distant regulatory concept. In an increasing number of jurisdictions, it is an enforceable obligation, and virtual asset service providers are expected to demonstrate compliance in practice, not merely in policy documents. Yet the gap between regulatory intent and day-to-day operations

The financial regulatory landscape of the European Union has undergone a transformation with the introduction of the new Anti-Money Laundering (AML) package, specifically targeting the sector of digital assets. Central to this transformation is the implementation of the EU Crypto Travel Rule, codified under Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, also

Summary: The EU's Anti-Money Laundering Regulation has entered into force, but its obligations for obliged entities generally apply from 10 July 2027. In September 2026, EU crypto businesses remain subject to the existing AML framework alongside MiCA and the already applicable Transfer of Funds Regulation, while AMLA

Summary: A UK crypto business in late 2026 is subject to two regulatory timelines at once. Today, FCA registration under the Money Laundering Regulations remains the operative requirement for in-scope cryptoasset firms, alongside the Travel Rule (in force since 1 September 2023), the financial promotions regime (since 8 October

Put three KYC provider websites side by side and the feature lists look almost identical: document verification, biometrics, sanctions screening, global coverage, API, AI-powered fraud detection. Run the same 1,000 customers through all three and the results will not be. Completion rates differ, as do legitimate-user rejections,

Summary: "MiCA license" is the market term. The legal concept is authorization as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider under Regulation (EU) 2023/1114. The EU-wide transitional period ended on 1 July 2026, so legacy national VASP status no longer provides a basis for continuing MiCA-regulated services.

TL;DR: U.S. crypto regulation is still split between federal and state authorities, and no single agency resolves a business's full compliance scope. But the picture has changed materially. FinCEN and the Bank Secrecy Act still supply the core AML framework for businesses that qualify as money

Japan's crypto Travel Rule does not apply to every outbound transfer. It applies to transfers going to service providers in a specific list of jurisdictions that Japan has assessed as having equivalent rules — 58 of them, plus five more added with effect from 3 August 2026: Anguilla, Botswana,

In 2026, crypto compliance is no longer a question of whether obligations apply — it is a question of which set of obligations applies to your business, where, and when. Crypto businesses now operate inside a network of concrete, dated requirements: FATF standards and the Travel Rule globally, the final MiCA

Few things are more stressful than discovering your digital funds are gone. A scam or theft in cryptocurrency can trigger panic, leaving every victim with one burning question: how to recover stolen cryptocurrency? According to AMLBot’s data, monthly losses across different fraud categories show a clear trend: while centralized